Simplification of logic in server_lost()
Should have no change to behaviour.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -621,10 +621,9 @@ static void server_lost(int s)
|
||||
{
|
||||
set_server_reconnect(s, 1);
|
||||
|
||||
if (server_list[s].from_server != -1)
|
||||
if ((server_list[s].from_server != -1) && (server_list[s].from_server != s))
|
||||
{
|
||||
if ((server_list[server_list[s].from_server].read != -1) &&
|
||||
(server_list[s].from_server != s))
|
||||
if (is_server_open(server_list[s].from_server))
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* Set the windows back to the old server */
|
||||
say("Connection to server %s resumed...", server_list[server_list[s].from_server].name);
|
||||
@@ -632,7 +631,7 @@ static void server_lost(int s)
|
||||
set_window_server(-1, s, 1);
|
||||
set_server_reconnect(s, 0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
else if (server_list[s].from_server != s)
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
close_server(server_list[s].from_server, empty_string);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user